Noun v Sutherland Shire Council (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 39
The Court held it was fair and reasonable for the Council to pay the Applicant's costs of the hearing on 7 April 2011 as the Council introduced the fender piles issue late and failed to comply with Class 1 Practice Directions, causing extra expense. The Applicant was also awarded her costs of the Notice of Motion,...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Costs Determination Following Merits Appeal
- Outcome
- Costs partly awarded to Applicant
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'merits Appeal' 'practice Directions' 'development Consent Conditions']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Costs Determination Following Merits Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it is fair and reasonable in a merits appeal under Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 97 to award costs incurred due to a contention introduced late by the Council not in accordance with Class 1 practice directions' 'Exercise of discretion to award partial costs in circumstances of late issue']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held it was fair and reasonable for the Council to pay the Applicant's costs of the hearing on 7 April 2011 as the Council introduced the fender piles issue late and failed to comply with Class 1 Practice Directions, causing extra expense. The Applicant was also awarded her costs of the Notice of Motion, but not all costs of meeting the issue, as the issue was properly raised and the Council's actions were not fully unreasonable.
Court Disposition
Costs partly awarded to Applicant
Orders
- ["The Council is to pay the Applicant's costs of the hearing on 7 April 2011 as agreed or assessed." "The Council is to pay the Applicant's costs of the Applicant's Notice of Motion filed 11 November 2011 as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment