Re McMahon, John Keith Ex Parte News Ltd [1996] FCA 1152
In the absence of any proper evidence or submissions from the Debtor and being satisfied with proof of matters under s 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, a sequestration order should be made on the creditor's petition.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Hearing of Creditor's Petition Following Application to Set Aside Deed of Arrangement and Dismiss Order
- Outcome
- sequestration order made against debtor's estate; stay of steps pursuant to the order until 10 January 1997; leave reserved for debtor to apply to set aside the order
- Legal Topics
- ['deed of Arrangement' "creditor's Petition" 'sequestration Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Hearing of Creditor's Petition Following Application to Set Aside Deed of Arrangement and Dismiss Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether deed of arrangement should be terminated' "Whether creditor's petition should be reinstated and sequestration order made"]
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of any proper evidence or submissions from the Debtor and being satisfied with proof of matters under s 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, a sequestration order should be made on the creditor's petition.
Court Disposition
sequestration order made against debtor's estate; stay of steps pursuant to the order until 10 January 1997; leave reserved for debtor to apply to set aside the order
Orders
- ['Sequestration order made against the estate of John Keith McMahon.' 'Stay of all steps pursuant to the sequestration order until 10 January 1997.' 'Leave reserved for the debtor to apply, by motion and supporting affidavit(s), to set aside the sequestration order.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment