Rigoli v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCAFC 29

Rigoli v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCAFC 29

Mr Rigoli failed to discharge the burden of proving that the s 167 assessments were excessive because he did not prove his actual taxable income or provide a probative foundation for findings about income; his concession that assessable income was not disputed was treated by the AAT as withdrawal or abandonment of that part of the objection, not as evidence. The AAT therefore erred in deciding the matter by considering only deductions, and the primary judge was correct to set aside the AAT decision. The primary judge did not err in remitting the proceeding because no futility submission had been made below and remittal was within the statutory discretion, but the remittal should be...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal From the Federal Court Concerning AAT Review of Objection Decisions, With Cross Appeal as to Consequential Orders / Full Court Appeal and Cross Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; orders of Pagone J supplemented; otherwise cross-appeal dismissed; no order as to costs of the cross-appeal.
Legal Topics
['default Assessments Under S 167' 'burden of Proving Assessments Excessive' 'aat Review of Taxation Objection Decisions' 'remittal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal' 'limits on Further Evidence After Remittal']
['income Tax' 'administrative Law' 'practice and Procedure'] ['default Assessments Under S 167' 'burden of Proving Assessments Excessive' 'aat Review of Taxation Objection Decisions' 'remittal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal' 'limits on Further Evidence After Remittal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Income Tax Appeal From the Federal Court Concerning AAT Review of Objection Decisions, With Cross Appeal as to Consequential Orders / Full Court Appeal and Cross Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Mr Rigoli discharged the burden under s 14ZZK(b)(i) of proving that income tax assessments made under s 167 were excessive.' "Whether a concession or acceptance of the Commissioner's estimate of assessable income could provide a probative basis for proving the assessments excessive while disputing only deductions." 'Whether the AAT, in a merits review, could treat the assessable income element as no longer in dispute and determine only depreciation deductions.' "Whether the primary judge erred by remitting the proceeding to the AAT rather than affirming the Commissioner's objection decisions." 'Whether any remittal to the AAT should be limited to the evidence before the AAT in the original proceeding.']

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Rigoli failed to discharge the burden of proving that the s 167 assessments were excessive because he did not prove his actual taxable income or provide a probative foundation for findings about income; his concession that assessable income was not disputed was treated by the AAT as withdrawal or abandonment of that part of the objection, not as evidence. The AAT therefore erred in deciding the matter by considering only deductions, and the primary judge was correct to set aside the AAT decision. The primary judge did not err in remitting the proceeding because no futility submission had been made below and remittal was within the statutory discretion, but the remittal should be...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; orders of Pagone J supplemented; otherwise cross-appeal dismissed; no order as to costs of the cross-appeal.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed with costs.' 'The orders made by Pagone J on 7 August 2013 be supplemented by the addition of the following order: 4. In the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, subject to any order of the Tribunal for proper cause, the remitted proceeding be heard and determined on the evidence which was...