RADIO 2UE SYDNEY PTY LTD & ANOR v GOLDSWORTHY [2000] NSWCA 130
Leave to appeal was refused because the claimants did not show an arguable error in the trial judge's conclusions that the imputation was not confined to a matter of public interest and was not based on proper material, there being no rational relationship between the opponent's conduct as a barrister in the committal proceedings and the imputation that he was generally a heartless person.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Application for Leave to Appeal From Supreme Court Common Law Division
- Outcome
- Leave refused - Summons dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['defence of Comment' 'proper Material for Comment' 'public Interest' 'rational Relationship Between Material and Imputation' 'leave to Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Application for Leave to Appeal From Supreme Court Common Law Division
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the claimants had an arguable case of error in the rejection of the defence of comment referable to the imputation that the opponent was a heartless person.' 'Whether the imputation was a statement of fact rather than comment.' 'Whether the imputation related to a matter of public interest.' 'Whether the imputation was based on proper material and had a rational relationship with the material relied upon by the claimants.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the claimants did not show an arguable error in the trial judge's conclusions that the imputation was not confined to a matter of public interest and was not based on proper material, there being no rational relationship between the opponent's conduct as a barrister in the committal proceedings and the imputation that he was generally a heartless person.
Court Disposition
Leave refused - Summons dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Leave refused.' 'Summons dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment