Gibbs, D v Capewell, L & Ors [1995] FCA 25
Under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989, a person must have some degree of descent from the Aboriginal inhabitants of Australia before European settlement to qualify as an 'Aboriginal person'; but, particularly where descent is slight, genuine self-identification as Aboriginal and/or acceptance by the Aboriginal community may also be required to meet the statutory definition. Merely having a distant Aboriginal ancestor, without more, is not enough, nor is mere self-identification or community acceptance in the absence of descent.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Desmond Gibbs; First Respondent: Lyle Capewell; Second Respondent: Australian Electoral Commission; Respondent by Election: Minister for Aboriginal and Islander Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Preliminary Question (construction of 'aboriginal Person')
- Outcome
- No formal order made at this stage; reasons published for preliminary issue; further hearing adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Definition of 'aboriginal Person', Statutory Construction, Indigenous Eligibility for Election, Statutory Elections
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Desmond Gibbs
Petitioner
Lyle Capewell
First Respondent
Australian Electoral Commission
Second Respondent
Minister for Aboriginal and Islander Affairs
Respondent by Election
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Preliminary Question (construction of 'aboriginal Person')
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the meaning of 'Aboriginal person' under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989 for the purposes of eligibility to stand or vote in elections?
Ratio Decidendi
Under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989, a person must have some degree of descent from the Aboriginal inhabitants of Australia before European settlement to qualify as an 'Aboriginal person'; but, particularly where descent is slight, genuine self-identification as Aboriginal and/or acceptance by the Aboriginal community may also be required to meet the statutory definition. Merely having a distant Aboriginal ancestor, without more, is not enough, nor is mere self-identification or community acceptance in the absence of descent.
Court Disposition
No formal order made at this stage; reasons published for preliminary issue; further hearing adjourned.
Orders
- Reasons for judgment delivered; question of meaning of 'Aboriginal person' determined as preliminary issue; no formal order pronounced; further hearing adjourned for directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment