Shugg v Commissioner for Road Transport and Tramways (NSW) [1937] HCA 50
A casual employee appointed under sec. 101 of the Transport Act 1930 (N.S.W.), who is employed continuously or indefinitely, is an 'officer' within sec. 123 and is entitled to the leave benefits provided therein, including leave in lieu of bank holidays worked. The statutory definition of 'officer' applies unless the context or subject matter excludes such employees, which it does not in this case.
- Parties
- Appellant, Plaintiff: Harold Robert Shugg; Respondent, Defendant: Commissioner for Road Transport and Tramways (New South Wales)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Decision of the Full Court set aside. Plaintiff entitled to verdict and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Definition of 'officer' Under Transport Act, Entitlement to Leave for Casual Employees, Bank Holidays and Employment Benefits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harold Robert Shugg
Appellant, Plaintiff
Commissioner for Road Transport and Tramways (New South Wales)
Respondent, Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a casual employee appointed under sec. 101 of the Transport Act 1930 (N.S.W.) is an 'officer' for the purposes of sec. 123 and therefore entitled to leave in lieu of working on bank holidays
Ratio Decidendi
A casual employee appointed under sec. 101 of the Transport Act 1930 (N.S.W.), who is employed continuously or indefinitely, is an 'officer' within sec. 123 and is entitled to the leave benefits provided therein, including leave in lieu of bank holidays worked. The statutory definition of 'officer' applies unless the context or subject matter excludes such employees, which it does not in this case.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Decision of the Full Court set aside. Plaintiff entitled to verdict and costs.
Orders
- Order of Full Court set aside.
- Question in special case answered: Yes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment