DEG v Children’s Guardian [2018] NSWCATAD 241
DEG poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, despite significant reform and remorse, as evidenced by his violent criminal history, child protection reports, and expert assessment of low to moderate risk. The decision to refuse a working with children check clearance is affirmed based on the paramount consideration of child safety.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Decision
- Outcome
- The Tribunal affirms the Children's Guardian's refusal to grant DEG a working with children check clearance.
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check Clearance' 'risk Assessment' 'violence Offences' 'apprehended Violence Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether DEG poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children warranting refusal of a working with children check clearance']
Ratio Decidendi
DEG poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, despite significant reform and remorse, as evidenced by his violent criminal history, child protection reports, and expert assessment of low to moderate risk. The decision to refuse a working with children check clearance is affirmed based on the paramount consideration of child safety.
Court Disposition
The Tribunal affirms the Children's Guardian's refusal to grant DEG a working with children check clearance.
Orders
- ["The decision of the Children's Guardian to refuse to grant the applicant a working with children check clearance is affirmed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment