Kemppi v Adani Mining Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 715
The Court decided not to allow expert evidence related to mining economics or anthropology as such evidence was not relevant to any facts pleaded in the current statement of claim. The trial will be set based on closed pleadings with exchange of affidavits and negotiations for an agreed statement of facts.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title / Trial Programming Orders and Trial Date Scheduling
- Outcome
- Application for expert evidence refused; trial date fixed
- Legal Topics
- ['expert Evidence' 'trial Procedure' 'indigenous Land Use Agreements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title / Trial Programming Orders and Trial Date Scheduling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether expert evidence should be allowed regarding benefits from the ILUA' 'Whether anthropological expert evidence is relevant to the pleaded facts' 'Sequence of trial programming orders' 'Date of trial']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court decided not to allow expert evidence related to mining economics or anthropology as such evidence was not relevant to any facts pleaded in the current statement of claim. The trial will be set based on closed pleadings with exchange of affidavits and negotiations for an agreed statement of facts.
Court Disposition
Application for expert evidence refused; trial date fixed
Orders
- ['The first respondent is to bring in a set of orders reflecting the rulings made.' 'Matter fixed for trial on 12 to 14 March 2018']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment