Deller Homes v Sutherland [2004] NSWLEC 66
The proposal's scale, orientation, streetscape impact, and adaptable housing provision are acceptable given compliance with the DCP and site-specific circumstances. The calculation of floor space under the LEP is unreasonable due to an acknowledged anomaly in the definition, so SEPP 1 objection is upheld. The proposal should be approved subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'floor Space Ratio' 'adaptable Housing' 'streetscape Impact']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the design, orientation, and internal amenity of the proposal are acceptable' "Whether the proposal's impact on the privacy of the western adjoining property is acceptable" 'Whether the bulk, scale, and additional floor space of the proposal are justified and compliant' 'Whether the adaptable housing provisions have been satisfactorily addressed']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal's scale, orientation, streetscape impact, and adaptable housing provision are acceptable given compliance with the DCP and site-specific circumstances. The calculation of floor space under the LEP is unreasonable due to an acknowledged anomaly in the definition, so SEPP 1 objection is upheld. The proposal should be approved subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved with conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development application to demolish the existing four dwellings and erect and subdivide under Strata title a development consisting of twelve townhouses on lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 DP 24110, known as 39-45 Manchester Road, North Gymea is determined by the granting of consent subject to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment