Delta Electricity v Blue Mountains Conservation Society Inc (security for costs) [2010] NSWCA 264
Leave to appeal in the security for costs matter should be refused because the trial judge properly determined the application in light of the pre-existing maximum costs order, and to require security in an amount higher than $20,000 would undermine that order.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Leave to Appeal in Security for Costs Matter
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal in the security for costs matter dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'maximum Costs Order' 'leave to Appeal']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Leave to Appeal in Security for Costs Matter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in determining the security for costs application on the basis of a prior maximum costs order under UCPR r 42.4' 'Whether discretion was unjustifiably restricted, wrong principle applied, or extraneous matters affected judgment']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal in the security for costs matter should be refused because the trial judge properly determined the application in light of the pre-existing maximum costs order, and to require security in an amount higher than $20,000 would undermine that order.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal in the security for costs matter dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The summons for leave to appeal in the security for costs matter is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment