Cumming v Sands [2001] NSWSC 599

Cumming v Sands [2001] NSWSC 599

The first defendant defended proceedings in her own interest rather than for the benefit of her mother's estate; therefore, she should not be entitled to recoup her own costs out of the estate under Part 52A r 42 of Supreme Court Rules 1970.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Judgment on Costs Following Substantive Decisions
Outcome
Executor ought not have her own costs of the proceedings out of the estate.
Legal Topics
['costs' "trustees' Entitlement to Costs" 'costs Out of Estate' 'conduct of Beneficiaries and Executors']
['equity' 'probate' 'trusts'] ['costs' "trustees' Entitlement to Costs" 'costs Out of Estate' 'conduct of Beneficiaries and Executors']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings / Judgment on Costs Following Substantive Decisions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the first defendant is entitled to recoup her own costs out of her mother's estate under Supreme Court Rules 1970 Part 52A r 42" 'Whether conduct of the trustee justified costs out of estate' 'Application of exception for acting for own benefit']

Ratio Decidendi

The first defendant defended proceedings in her own interest rather than for the benefit of her mother's estate; therefore, she should not be entitled to recoup her own costs out of the estate under Part 52A r 42 of Supreme Court Rules 1970.

Court Disposition

Executor ought not have her own costs of the proceedings out of the estate.

Orders

  • ["First defendant (Mrs Sands) not entitled to recoup her own costs out of her mother's estate" 'Plaintiff entitled to an order under Supreme Court Rules 1970 Part 52A r 42']