Dempsey v Harris Scarfe Ltd [1969] HCA 43
The appeal was incompetent because the appellant did not satisfy the High Court, on the material presented, that the civil right involved in the judgment was or probably was of the value of $3,000 as required for an appeal as of right under s. 35 (1) (a) of the Judiciary Act 1903 Cth.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From a Judgment of a Judge of the Supreme Court of South Australia Sitting Alone in an Action Under the Wrongs Act, 1936 1959 S.a. / Appeal as of Right; Competency Considered by the High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as incompetent. No order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['competency of Appeal as of Right' 'value of Civil Right for Appeal Threshold' 'employer Duty of Care' 'workplace Accident' 'wrongful Death Claim']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Judgment of a Judge of the Supreme Court of South Australia Sitting Alone in an Action Under the Wrongs Act, 1936 1959 S.a. / Appeal as of Right; Competency Considered by the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal lay as of right under s. 35 (1) (a) of the Judiciary Act 1903 Cth by involving a civil right of the value of $3,000.' 'Whether the appellant had provided admissible material showing facts sufficient to establish the competency of the appeal.' 'Whether, on the merits, the employer breached its common law duty of care to the deceased employee.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was incompetent because the appellant did not satisfy the High Court, on the material presented, that the civil right involved in the judgment was or probably was of the value of $3,000 as required for an appeal as of right under s. 35 (1) (a) of the Judiciary Act 1903 Cth.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as incompetent. No order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed as incompetent.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment