DEN v Benevolent Society [2018] NSWCATAD 131
The respondent's decisions to remove the children from DEN's care and cancel DEN's authorised carer status are upheld, as DEN did not sufficiently address the risks and deficits identified by evidence and expert assessment; removal was necessary to protect the children from unacceptable risk of harm and ensure their needs are met.
- Parties
- Applicant: DEN; Respondent: Benevolent Society
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; respondent’s decisions affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Cancellation of Authorised Carer Status, Removal of Children From Care, Out of Home Care, Procedural Fairness, Risk of Harm to Children
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DEN
Applicant
Benevolent Society
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent correctly cancelled DEN's authorised carer status
- 2 Whether removal of the children from DEN's care was justified
- 3 Whether DEN is able to resume parental care for the children
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's decisions to remove the children from DEN's care and cancel DEN's authorised carer status are upheld, as DEN did not sufficiently address the risks and deficits identified by evidence and expert assessment; removal was necessary to protect the children from unacceptable risk of harm and ensure their needs are met.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; respondent’s decisions affirmed.
Orders
- The decision of the respondent to remove from DEN the responsibility for the daily care and control of 'S' and 'J' is affirmed.
- The decision of the respondent to cancel DEN's authorisation as an authorised carer is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment