SafeWork NSW v Denbrok Constructions Pty Limited [2023] NSWDC 407
Denbrok Constructions Pty Limited, as a PCBU, failed to implement adequate reasonably practicable measures (such as edge protection, harnesses, supervision, and training) to prevent workers from being exposed to the risk of a fall from height, resulting in a breach of its nondelegable safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW). The objective seriousness of the offence is high given the foreseeability and known risks, the vulnerability of the worker, and the simplicity of available controls. The penalty was adjusted in consideration of the defendant's limited financial capacity, early guilty plea, prior good character, and remedial actions taken, but a substantial fine...
- Parties
- Prosecutor: SafeWork NSW; Defendant: Denbrok Constructions Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Defendant convicted and fined, with orders for costs.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Work Health and Safety Offences, Duty of Care, Objective Seriousness, Mitigating and Aggravating Factors, Deterrence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SafeWork NSW
Prosecutor
Denbrok Constructions Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant failed to comply with its WHS duty to ensure the health and safety of workers so far as reasonably practicable
- 2 The appropriate penalty for the failure, considering objective and subjective factors
Ratio Decidendi
Denbrok Constructions Pty Limited, as a PCBU, failed to implement adequate reasonably practicable measures (such as edge protection, harnesses, supervision, and training) to prevent workers from being exposed to the risk of a fall from height, resulting in a breach of its nondelegable safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW). The objective seriousness of the offence is high given the foreseeability and known risks, the vulnerability of the worker, and the simplicity of available controls. The penalty was adjusted in consideration of the defendant's limited financial capacity, early guilty plea, prior good character, and remedial actions taken, but a substantial fine...
Court Disposition
Defendant convicted and fined, with orders for costs.
Orders
- Defendant convicted.
- Appropriate fine for the offence is $400,000.00, reduced by 25% for guilty plea to $300,000.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment