Cook v Endovasive P/L & Ors [2004] NSWSC 876

Cook v Endovasive P/L & Ors [2004] NSWSC 876

The extension of the limitation period was granted because, despite some documentary records being unavailable, sufficient relevant medical notes and evidence remained for a fair trial, and the reasons for the plaintiff's delay (not knowing the filshie clip failure may have been actionable until 1999) were accepted as reasonable. The court was satisfied it was just and reasonable to grant an extension of time as the prejudice to the defendants did not outweigh the circumstances warranting extension.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Limitation Period in Negligence Action / Decision on Application
Outcome
Extension of limitation period granted; costs ordered against plaintiff.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time to Commence Proceedings' 'personal Injury' 'negligence' 'limitation Period' 'informed Consent']
['tort Law' 'limitation of Actions'] ['extension of Time to Commence Proceedings' 'personal Injury' 'negligence' 'limitation Period' 'informed Consent']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Limitation Period in Negligence Action / Decision on Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an extension of time should be granted to commence proceedings outside the limitation period under ss 60C & 60E of the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW)' 'Whether the delay has caused prejudice to the defendants' 'Whether the plaintiff has a prima facie case on the informed consent issue']

Ratio Decidendi

The extension of the limitation period was granted because, despite some documentary records being unavailable, sufficient relevant medical notes and evidence remained for a fair trial, and the reasons for the plaintiff's delay (not knowing the filshie clip failure may have been actionable until 1999) were accepted as reasonable. The court was satisfied it was just and reasonable to grant an extension of time as the prejudice to the defendants did not outweigh the circumstances warranting extension.

Court Disposition

Extension of limitation period granted; costs ordered against plaintiff.

Orders

  • ['The plaintiff be granted an extension of the limitation period up to and including 23 September 2004 as against the second and third defendants.' "The plaintiff is to pay the second and third defendants' costs as agreed or assessed."]