Ibrahim v Dos Remedios [2005] NSWSC 202

Ibrahim v Dos Remedios [2005] NSWSC 202

The Plaintiff failed to demonstrate he had been left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance, as he would receive a substantial sum from the estate and there was no evidence substantiating the necessity or cost of alternative accommodation. The Plaintiff's children were not shown to be dependent on the deceased and therefore were not eligible persons; in any event, there were no additional factors warranting their claims. Accordingly, the claims were dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Succession Family Provision Claim / Final Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claims dismissed.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'intestacy' 'provision for Maintenance' 'eligibility Under Family Provision Act' 'dependency of Grandchildren' 'competing Claims on Estate']
['succession Law'] ['family Provision' 'intestacy' 'provision for Maintenance' 'eligibility Under Family Provision Act' 'dependency of Grandchildren' 'competing Claims on Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Succession Family Provision Claim / Final Judgment at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Plaintiff (son) has been left without adequate provision for proper maintenance from the deceased's estate" 'Whether the Plaintiff’s children (grandchildren of the deceased) are eligible persons under the Family Provision Act 1982 and/or were dependent on the deceased' 'Whether there are factors warranting an application under s 9(1) Family Provision Act for the grandchildren' 'Whether the Plaintiff’s asserted need for accommodation justifies an order for provision']

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff failed to demonstrate he had been left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance, as he would receive a substantial sum from the estate and there was no evidence substantiating the necessity or cost of alternative accommodation. The Plaintiff's children were not shown to be dependent on the deceased and therefore were not eligible persons; in any event, there were no additional factors warranting their claims. Accordingly, the claims were dismissed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claims dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The proceedings be dismissed.' 'The Plaintiff pay the costs of the Defendant, on the party and party basis.' 'The Defendant be entitled to retain out of the assets of the estate of the late Ana Ibrahim the difference between the costs she may recover on a party-and-party basis and indemnity costs.' 'The exhibits...