Conway v Jackson [2001] FCA 230

Conway v Jackson [2001] FCA 230

The Full Court found that the phrase 'proceedings to set aside the judgment or order' in s 41(6A) does include an appeal aiming to set aside the judgment; therefore, the primary judge correctly exercised the power to extend time for compliance with the bankruptcy notice, and the appeal must be dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Denise Conway; Respondent: Alan Jackson
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment (federal Court of Australia, Full Court)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal as 'proceedings to Set Aside Judgment' Under S 41(6 A) Bankruptcy Act 1966, Extension of Time for Compliance With Bankruptcy Notice, Discretion Under S 41(6 A) and S 41(6 C) Bankruptcy Act 1966

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 30 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Denise Conway

Appellant

Alan Jackson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment (federal Court of Australia, Full Court)

  1. 1 Does the expression 'proceedings to set aside the judgment or order' in s 41(6A) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) include an appeal from the decision in which the judgment was given, for purposes of extending time to comply with a bankruptcy notice?

Ratio Decidendi

The Full Court found that the phrase 'proceedings to set aside the judgment or order' in s 41(6A) does include an appeal aiming to set aside the judgment; therefore, the primary judge correctly exercised the power to extend time for compliance with the bankruptcy notice, and the appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The appellant pay to the respondent costs of the appeal to be taxed.