Conway v Jackson [2001] FCA 230
The Full Court found that the phrase 'proceedings to set aside the judgment or order' in s 41(6A) does include an appeal aiming to set aside the judgment; therefore, the primary judge correctly exercised the power to extend time for compliance with the bankruptcy notice, and the appeal must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Denise Conway; Respondent: Alan Jackson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment (federal Court of Australia, Full Court)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal as 'proceedings to Set Aside Judgment' Under S 41(6 A) Bankruptcy Act 1966, Extension of Time for Compliance With Bankruptcy Notice, Discretion Under S 41(6 A) and S 41(6 C) Bankruptcy Act 1966
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Denise Conway
Appellant
Alan Jackson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment (federal Court of Australia, Full Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the expression 'proceedings to set aside the judgment or order' in s 41(6A) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) include an appeal from the decision in which the judgment was given, for purposes of extending time to comply with a bankruptcy notice?
Ratio Decidendi
The Full Court found that the phrase 'proceedings to set aside the judgment or order' in s 41(6A) does include an appeal aiming to set aside the judgment; therefore, the primary judge correctly exercised the power to extend time for compliance with the bankruptcy notice, and the appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The appellant pay to the respondent costs of the appeal to be taxed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment