Reid v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1036
Because the parties agreed under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to uphold the appeal and grant development consent subject to conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, including because the development was permissible under the Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010 and relevant concurrence, BASIX, koala habitat, bushfire and notification matters had been addressed, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal Against Actual Refusal of Development Application Da/17/0756 / Final Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['seniors Housing Development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'development Appeal' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'conditions of Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal Against Actual Refusal of Development Application Da/17/0756 / Final Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders giving effect to the parties' s 34(3) agreement to uphold the appeal and grant development consent subject to conditions." 'Whether the proposed development was lawful and permissible under the applicable planning instruments and statutory requirements.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties agreed under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to uphold the appeal and grant development consent subject to conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, including because the development was permissible under the Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010 and relevant concurrence, BASIX, koala habitat, bushfire and notification matters had been addressed, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to amend the development application by substituting the listed plans and documentation as the plans and documentation relied upon for the purpose of the development application.' "Pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), the applicant...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment