Furey v Mackne [1999] NSWSC 1298
Rectification was granted because clear and cogent affidavit evidence showed that the trust deed mistakenly recorded the anticipated purchase price as the settled sum and unit issue figures rather than the intended figures, and the only beneficiary, directly and through his superannuation fund, supported the application so no beneficiary prejudice issue arose.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings for Rectification of a Trust Instrument / Application for an Order Rectifying a Unit Trust Deed
- Outcome
- Order for rectification made.
- Legal Topics
- ['rectification of Trust Instrument' 'equitable Remedies' 'evidentiary Requirements' 'unit Trust Deed']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings for Rectification of a Trust Instrument / Application for an Order Rectifying a Unit Trust Deed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should rectify the Mackne Investment Unit Trust deed to correct mistakenly recorded settled sum and unit issue figures.' 'Whether there was clear and cogent evidence of the true intention behind the trust instrument.' 'Whether rectification would prejudice beneficiaries without an opportunity to be heard.']
Ratio Decidendi
Rectification was granted because clear and cogent affidavit evidence showed that the trust deed mistakenly recorded the anticipated purchase price as the settled sum and unit issue figures rather than the intended figures, and the only beneficiary, directly and through his superannuation fund, supported the application so no beneficiary prejudice issue arose.
Court Disposition
Order for rectification made.
Orders
- ['The order sought in paragraph 1 of the summons was made.' 'The trust instrument was rectified to substitute the intended settled sum and unit figures for the mistakenly recorded figures.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment