Lennon, Dennis Keith v Davenport, D & Ors [1984] FCA 342
The resolution purporting to ban members from attending the Engadine Apex Show was not made bona fide for the benefit of members as a whole, but improperly targeted and discriminated against the applicant alone. This was an unreasonable restraint of trade and a misuse of the Committee's power under the Rules and objects of the Guild. Accordingly, the resolution and any action to enforce it are void and of no effect.
- Parties
- Applicant: Dennis Keith Lennon; Respondent: D. Davenport; Respondent: L. Short; Respondent: D. Roberts; Respondent: R. Phillips; Respondent: J. Osborne; Respondent: W. Davis; Respondent: S. Neal; Respondent: G. Ertterson; Respondent: J. Howard; Respondent: P. Short; Respondent: Whittingslow; Respondent: J. Davis; Respondent: K. March; Respondent: J. Marshall; Respondent: S. Durkin; Respondent: T. Marcovich; Respondent: D. Watkins; Respondent: J. Lynch; Respondent: N. McGregor; Respondent: F. Laurie; Respondent: G. Frankcom
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S.141 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 / Final Judgment and Orders After Hearing
- Outcome
- Orders granted restraining respondents from prohibiting members from engaging with the Engadine Apex Club and directing them to treat the relevant resolution as void and of no effect.
- Legal Topics
- Restraint of Trade, Reasonableness of Restraint, Powers of Trade Associations, Rules of Industrial Organisations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dennis Keith Lennon
Applicant
D. Davenport
Respondent
L. Short
Respondent
D. Roberts
Respondent
R. Phillips
Respondent
J. Osborne
Respondent
W. Davis
Respondent
S. Neal
Respondent
G. Ertterson
Respondent
J. Howard
Respondent
P. Short
Respondent
Whittingslow
Respondent
J. Davis
Respondent
K. March
Respondent
J. Marshall
Respondent
S. Durkin
Respondent
T. Marcovich
Respondent
D. Watkins
Respondent
J. Lynch
Respondent
N. McGregor
Respondent
F. Laurie
Respondent
G. Frankcom
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under S.141 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 / Final Judgment and Orders After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Showmen's Guild Executive's resolution to ban members from the Engadine Apex Show was beyond power or ultra vires
- 2 Whether the resolution constituted an unlawful or unreasonable restraint of trade
- 3 Whether the Executive's resolution was made bona fide in the interests of members as a whole
Ratio Decidendi
The resolution purporting to ban members from attending the Engadine Apex Show was not made bona fide for the benefit of members as a whole, but improperly targeted and discriminated against the applicant alone. This was an unreasonable restraint of trade and a misuse of the Committee's power under the Rules and objects of the Guild. Accordingly, the resolution and any action to enforce it are void and of no effect.
Court Disposition
Orders granted restraining respondents from prohibiting members from engaging with the Engadine Apex Club and directing them to treat the relevant resolution as void and of no effect.
Orders
- The respondents and each of them and their servants and agents be restrained from making any statement or representation to the effect that any member of the Showmen's Guild of Australasia is not entitled to provide amusements at any show conducted by the Engadine Apex Club.
- The respondents and each of them perform and observe the Rules of the Showmen's Guild of Australasia by treating the resolution passed at the Executive meeting of the Showmen's Guild of Australasia on 6 December 1983 as null, void and of no effect to the extent that it instructs members to refrain from attending any...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment