Croft, Dennis Malcolm v Mackellar, Michael J.R. [1983] FCA 18
The Minister erred in law by failing to have proper regard to the rent payable as a cost necessarily incurred in providing nursing care, as mandated by s.40AA(7) of the National Health Act 1953. The adoption and application of a policy excluding certain costs, including rent associated with change of ownership, from consideration was inconsistent with the statutory requirement to treat all such costs as fundamental elements in the fee determination. Consequently, the Minister's decision could not stand.
- Parties
- Applicant: Dennis Malcolm Croft; Respondent: Michael J.R. MacKellar
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Exercise of Ministerial Discretion, Statutory Interpretation, Health Law, Nursing Home Fees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dennis Malcolm Croft
Applicant
Michael J.R. MacKellar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister failed to have proper regard to costs necessarily incurred, specifically rent, in determining scale of nursing home fees as required by s.40AA(7) of the National Health Act 1953
- 2 Whether the application of a general policy by the Minister was inconsistent with the statutory duty to consider individual circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister erred in law by failing to have proper regard to the rent payable as a cost necessarily incurred in providing nursing care, as mandated by s.40AA(7) of the National Health Act 1953. The adoption and application of a policy excluding certain costs, including rent associated with change of ownership, from consideration was inconsistent with the statutory requirement to treat all such costs as fundamental elements in the fee determination. Consequently, the Minister's decision could not stand.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- The decision of the respondent dated 2 April 1981 to refuse the applicant's request to review the decision of the Permanent Head is set aside and the matter to which that decision relates is referred to the respondent for further consideration.
- The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment