Mulheron v Adams [2008] NSWLEC 1223
None of the tests in s 10(2)(a) or (b) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 were met as there was no evidence the tree had caused, was causing, or was likely to cause damage or injury. The application was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'neighbour Disputes' 'property Damage' 'injury Risk']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Is the tree likely to cause damage to Mr Mulheron's property or injury to any person under s 10(2)(a) and (b) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006?"]
Ratio Decidendi
None of the tests in s 10(2)(a) or (b) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 were met as there was no evidence the tree had caused, was causing, or was likely to cause damage or injury. The application was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment