Denoci Pty Limited v Liverpool City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1643
The proposed development involves removal of approximately one hectare of endangered ecological community vegetation and habitat for threatened species. This results in a significant impact on local populations and ecological connectivity, fails to comply with Liverpool Local Environment Plan 2008 cll 7.6 and 7.31, is not compliant with key controls in Liverpool DCP 2008 Section 4, and the applicant's Species Impact Statement does not adequately survey Hibbertia fumana. The significant impact cannot be offset by the offered biobanking solution, and the zoning objectives do not override statutory environmental requirements. Appeal is dismissed and development application refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: Denoci Pty Limited; Respondent: Liverpool City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Final Judgment, Post Hearing Determination
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Earthworks, Endangered Ecological Community, Environmentally Significant Land, Vegetation Removal, Biodiversity Offsetting, Statutory Compliance, Zoning, Public Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Denoci Pty Limited
Applicant
Liverpool City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Final Judgment, Post Hearing Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed earthworks and vegetation removal would have a significant impact on threatened species and ecological communities
- 2 Consistency of proposed development with Liverpool Local Environment Plan 2008 clauses 7.6 and 7.31
- 3 Compliance with Liverpool Development Control Plan 2008 Sections 3 and 4
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed development involves removal of approximately one hectare of endangered ecological community vegetation and habitat for threatened species. This results in a significant impact on local populations and ecological connectivity, fails to comply with Liverpool Local Environment Plan 2008 cll 7.6 and 7.31, is not compliant with key controls in Liverpool DCP 2008 Section 4, and the applicant's Species Impact Statement does not adequately survey Hibbertia fumana. The significant impact cannot be offset by the offered biobanking solution, and the zoning objectives do not override statutory environmental requirements. Appeal is dismissed and development application refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment