Graham v Department of Community Services [2001] NSWIRComm 166
Leave to appeal is refused as the matter is not appropriate for grant of leave. No error by the primary judge in considering the applicant's conduct in determining unfairness; Day v Lumley Life Limited is not authority requiring employee conduct to be decisive in such assessment.
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Karen Graham; Respondent: Department of Community Services
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal And, If Granted, Appeal From Judgment of Boland J
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Contract Proceedings, Leave to Appeal, Assessment of Conduct in Unfair Contract Claims, Costs in Appeal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Karen Graham
Applicant/appellant
Department of Community Services
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal And, If Granted, Appeal From Judgment of Boland J
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted in unfair contract proceedings under s 106 Industrial Relations Act 1996
- 2 Whether the primary judge erred in legal assessment of contract unfairness by reference to the conduct of the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is refused as the matter is not appropriate for grant of leave. No error by the primary judge in considering the applicant's conduct in determining unfairness; Day v Lumley Life Limited is not authority requiring employee conduct to be decisive in such assessment.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed; costs reserved.
Orders
- Leave to appeal is refused.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment