Design Link Australia Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1433
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted because the parties' agreement complies with planning legislation and standards, is permissible on the site, responds to submissions, and the decision is one the Court could properly make under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- Applicant: Design Link Australia Pty Ltd; Respondent: Sutherland Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to amended plans and conditions; applicant to pay respondent's thrown away costs.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application Appeal, Conciliation Conference, Boarding House Approval
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Design Link Australia Pty Ltd
Applicant
Sutherland Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development application should be approved subject to conditions
- 2 Whether amended application responds to concerns raised by local residents
- 3 Whether the proposal complies with relevant planning instruments
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted because the parties' agreement complies with planning legislation and standards, is permissible on the site, responds to submissions, and the decision is one the Court could properly make under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to amended plans and conditions; applicant to pay respondent's thrown away costs.
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to amend their development application in accordance with the plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure 'A'.
- The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away for the agreed amount of $3,000 as a result of amending the development application pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 within 28 days of the date of these Orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment