Macrae Knitting Mills Limited v Lowes Limited [1936] HCA 43
In a suit for infringement of a registered design under the Designs Act 1906-1934, the defendant may challenge the validity of the registration on grounds of lack of novelty or originality; the court found the appellant's swimming costume design was not new or original but a mere trade variation, and therefore not registrable or infringed.
- Parties
- Appellant; Plaintiff: Macrae Knitting Mills Limited; Respondent; Defendant: Lowes Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Design Registration, Validity of Registered Designs, Design Infringement, Want of Novelty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Macrae Knitting Mills Limited
Appellant; Plaintiff
Lowes Limited
Respondent; Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether in an action for infringement of a registered design, the defendant may raise the defence that the registration is invalid for want of novelty.
- 2 Whether the appellant’s swimming costume design is 'new or original' for the purposes of the Designs Act 1906-1934.
- 3 Whether the design relied upon by the plaintiff has been infringed by the defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
In a suit for infringement of a registered design under the Designs Act 1906-1934, the defendant may challenge the validity of the registration on grounds of lack of novelty or originality; the court found the appellant's swimming costume design was not new or original but a mere trade variation, and therefore not registrable or infringed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment