Boudan v Cunningham [2006] NFSC 1

Boudan v Cunningham [2006] NFSC 1

On a rehearing of the evidence, the written and oral observations of the police officer and attending doctor established beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and any non-compliance by the police officer with statutory notification requirements did not occasion unfairness or require exclusion of evidence or quashing of conviction.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Magistrates
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['driving Under the Influence' 'evidentiary Requirements' 'police Procedural Obligations']
['criminal Law'] ['driving Under the Influence' 'evidentiary Requirements' 'police Procedural Obligations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Magistrates

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt given evidence of head injury to appellant' 'Whether police officer complied with statutory obligations under s 32A of the Road Traffic Act 1982 (NI)' 'Effect of any noncompliance with s 32A on admissibility or outcome']

Ratio Decidendi

On a rehearing of the evidence, the written and oral observations of the police officer and attending doctor established beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and any non-compliance by the police officer with statutory notification requirements did not occasion unfairness or require exclusion of evidence or quashing of conviction.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.']