DET v Children's Guardian [2018] NSWCATAD 143
Having regard to all mandated statutory considerations, past conduct, seriousness of the offence, vulnerability and exposure of the children, and insufficient evidence to disprove existence of a real and appreciable risk, the Tribunal found DET poses an unacceptable risk to the safety of children and confirms refusal of clearance. Conditions cannot be imposed, and even if risk was not proven, a reasonable person would not allow unsupervised contact.
- Parties
- Applicant: DET; Respondent: Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Tribunal Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Working With Children Check, Risk Assessment, Child Abuse, Tribunal Powers, Publication Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DET
Applicant
Children's Guardian
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Tribunal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether DET should be granted a Working with Children Check clearance under the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012
- 2 Whether DET poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children
- 3 Whether the Tribunal may grant a clearance subject to conditions
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to all mandated statutory considerations, past conduct, seriousness of the offence, vulnerability and exposure of the children, and insufficient evidence to disprove existence of a real and appreciable risk, the Tribunal found DET poses an unacceptable risk to the safety of children and confirms refusal of clearance. Conditions cannot be imposed, and even if risk was not proven, a reasonable person would not allow unsupervised contact.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; decision confirmed
Orders
- The decision of the Children's Guardian on 15 December 2017 to refuse to grant DET a Working with Children Check clearance is confirmed.
- With the exception of expert witnesses and officers of government agencies, the publication or broadcast of the name of any person mentioned in these proceedings or referred to in the documentary material lodged in these proceedings is prohibited under s64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment