Dewar v Dewar [1960] HCA 79
The order made by Mack J. did not adequately secure the appellant's and children's interests, as it left their occupancy of the home uncertain and the compensation inadequate; thus, the only practicable course is to allow the settlements to stand and dismiss the respondent’s application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; order of Supreme Court set aside; respondent's application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['matrimonial Property' 'post Nuptial Settlements' 'dissolution of Marriage']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the transfer of property into joint names and erection of the matrimonial home constituted a post-nuptial settlement under s. 9 of The Matrimonial Causes Act of 1875 (Qld)' "Whether the order made by Mack J. was a satisfactory adjustment of the parties' and children's interests"]
Ratio Decidendi
The order made by Mack J. did not adequately secure the appellant's and children's interests, as it left their occupancy of the home uncertain and the compensation inadequate; thus, the only practicable course is to allow the settlements to stand and dismiss the respondent’s application.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; order of Supreme Court set aside; respondent's application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Order of Supreme Court of Queensland set aside.' 'Motion to the Supreme Court pursuant to the notice of 25th August 1959 and the petition dated 24th November 1958 dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment