DFN16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1474
The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal was wholly without merit; no appellable error was identified in the Federal Circuit Court’s dismissal, especially in light of the applicant’s own concession that the Tribunal committed no legal error.
- Parties
- Applicant: DFN16; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Judicial Review, Protection Visa, Tribunal Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DFN16
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for extension of time to seek leave to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the Federal Circuit Court primary judge erred in dismissing the application for judicial review
- 3 Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in affirming the refusal of a protection visa
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal was wholly without merit; no appellable error was identified in the Federal Circuit Court’s dismissal, especially in light of the applicant’s own concession that the Tribunal committed no legal error.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- The application for an extension of time within which to file an application for leave to appeal be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment