DFS Australia Pty Limited v The Comptroller-General of Customs [2017] FCA 547
The applicant is not the legal owner of the goods at the time of export under reg 134(6) of the Customs Regulations 1926 (Cth), as property passes to the traveller in the store upon sale; the appeal must therefore fail.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['duty Drawback' 'customs' 'statutory Construction' 'ownership of Goods' 'sale of Goods']
['taxation'] ['duty Drawback' 'customs' 'statutory Construction' 'ownership of Goods' 'sale of Goods']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Correct construction of 'legal owner' under reg 134(6) of Customs Regulations 1926 (Cth)" 'Whether applicant is the legal owner at time of export' "Whether Tribunal erred in law in its interpretation of 'legal owner'"]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is not the legal owner of the goods at the time of export under reg 134(6) of the Customs Regulations 1926 (Cth), as property passes to the traveller in the store upon sale; the appeal must therefore fail.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment