DGQ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 164
The appeal must be dismissed, as the appellant failed to establish any jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision, no breach of natural justice or procedural fairness was established, no credible evidence of unfair process or bias was adduced, and there was no failure to disclose a s 438 certificate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Federal Court of Australia – Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'credibility Assessment' 'jurisdictional Error' 'complementary Protection']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Federal Court of Australia – Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal denied the appellant natural justice or procedural fairness' "Whether the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings amounted to jurisdictional error" 'Whether failure to disclose a s 438 certificate arose and if so, whether this was a procedural fairness breach' 'Whether the Tribunal or Circuit Court fell into jurisdictional error']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal must be dismissed, as the appellant failed to establish any jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision, no breach of natural justice or procedural fairness was established, no credible evidence of unfair process or bias was adduced, and there was no failure to disclose a s 438 certificate.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed with costs.' 'The name of the first respondent be amended to be Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment