DHC16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 642
Given the applicant's repeated failure to attend hearings despite ample notice, lack of explanation, and absence of merit in the grounds for appeal, it was appropriate to dismiss the application for leave to appeal under r 35.33 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
- Parties
- Appellant: DHC16; First Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs; Second Respondent: Immigration Assessment Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed for non-appearance; costs awarded to the first respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Leave to Appeal, Dismissal for Non Appearance, Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DHC16
Appellant
Minister for Home Affairs
First Respondent
Immigration Assessment Authority
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted after dismissal of judicial review for non-appearance
- 2 Appropriateness of dismissal for absence under Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 35.33
- 3 Merit of the grounds of appeal by the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
Given the applicant's repeated failure to attend hearings despite ample notice, lack of explanation, and absence of merit in the grounds for appeal, it was appropriate to dismiss the application for leave to appeal under r 35.33 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed for non-appearance; costs awarded to the first respondent.
Orders
- The notice of appeal filed on 19 December 2018 is treated as an application for leave to appeal.
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed under r 35.33 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) due to the applicant's absence at the hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment