Diamond Hill International Pty Ltd v Xu [2000] FCA 892

Diamond Hill International Pty Ltd v Xu [2000] FCA 892

Service of the petition has been effected, the petitioning debt is still owing, and an act of bankruptcy was committed by the respondent, entitling the applicant to a sequestration order.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Final Hearing and Judgment
Outcome
Sequestration order granted against respondent's estate; applicant's costs taxed and paid; compensation ordered for subpoenaed parties' expenses.
Legal Topics
['sequestration Order' "petitioning Creditor's Debt" 'act of Bankruptcy' 'service of Petition' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Petition / Final Hearing and Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether service of the bankruptcy petition was properly effected' 'Whether the debt relied upon by the applicant is still owing' 'Whether an act of bankruptcy was committed by the respondent' "Whether the applicant is entitled to a sequestration order against the respondent's estate"]

Ratio Decidendi

Service of the petition has been effected, the petitioning debt is still owing, and an act of bankruptcy was committed by the respondent, entitling the applicant to a sequestration order.

Court Disposition

Sequestration order granted against respondent's estate; applicant's costs taxed and paid; compensation ordered for subpoenaed parties' expenses.

Orders

  • ['Applicant to pay agreed or assessed compensation to Eric Fung & Co, Parish Patience Solicitors, Clarence J Stevens QC, and Peter J W Huntingdon for expenses incurred complying with subpoenas' 'Sequestration order made against the estate of Humphrey Jian Xu' "Respondent to pay applicant's costs, including reserved...