Diamond Hill International Pty Ltd v Xu [2000] FCA 892
Service of the petition has been effected, the petitioning debt is still owing, and an act of bankruptcy was committed by the respondent, entitling the applicant to a sequestration order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Sequestration order granted against respondent's estate; applicant's costs taxed and paid; compensation ordered for subpoenaed parties' expenses.
- Legal Topics
- ['sequestration Order' "petitioning Creditor's Debt" 'act of Bankruptcy' 'service of Petition' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether service of the bankruptcy petition was properly effected' 'Whether the debt relied upon by the applicant is still owing' 'Whether an act of bankruptcy was committed by the respondent' "Whether the applicant is entitled to a sequestration order against the respondent's estate"]
Ratio Decidendi
Service of the petition has been effected, the petitioning debt is still owing, and an act of bankruptcy was committed by the respondent, entitling the applicant to a sequestration order.
Court Disposition
Sequestration order granted against respondent's estate; applicant's costs taxed and paid; compensation ordered for subpoenaed parties' expenses.
Orders
- ['Applicant to pay agreed or assessed compensation to Eric Fung & Co, Parish Patience Solicitors, Clarence J Stevens QC, and Peter J W Huntingdon for expenses incurred complying with subpoenas' 'Sequestration order made against the estate of Humphrey Jian Xu' "Respondent to pay applicant's costs, including reserved...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment