Jajieh v Woolworths Ltd [2010] NSWDC 239

Jajieh v Woolworths Ltd [2010] NSWDC 239

Upon being notified of a spillage on the floor, Woolworths Ltd, as occupier, failed to take reasonable steps to attend, clean, or isolate the hazard. This omission constituted a breach of the duty of care owed to the plaintiff. The breach was a necessary condition for the plaintiff’s fall and injury, and it is appropriate for liability to extend to her harm. The defendant was therefore liable in negligence for the injuries and consequential losses suffered by the plaintiff.

Parties
Plaintiff: Diane Jajieh; Defendant: Woolworths Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff on liability and damages; damages awarded subject to jurisdictional limit.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Damages, Duty of Care, Causation, Civil Liability Act 2002 (nsw)
Torts Personal Injury Occupier's Liability Negligence Damages Duty of Care Causation Civil Liability Act 2002 (nsw)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Diane Jajieh

Plaintiff

Woolworths Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Woolworths Ltd breached its duty of care to the plaintiff as occupier by failing to attend to a reported water spillage in a timely manner resulting in injury
  2. 2 Whether the defendant’s breach of duty caused the plaintiff’s injuries
  3. 3 Assessment of damages for various heads including non-economic loss, loss of earning capacity, care, and childcare

Ratio Decidendi

Upon being notified of a spillage on the floor, Woolworths Ltd, as occupier, failed to take reasonable steps to attend, clean, or isolate the hazard. This omission constituted a breach of the duty of care owed to the plaintiff. The breach was a necessary condition for the plaintiff’s fall and injury, and it is appropriate for liability to extend to her harm. The defendant was therefore liable in negligence for the injuries and consequential losses suffered by the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff on liability and damages; damages awarded subject to jurisdictional limit.

Orders

  • Verdict for the plaintiff on the issues of liability.
  • Damages are assessed in the sum of $766,793.