Speer v Willis [2013] NSWSC 886

Speer v Willis [2013] NSWSC 886

The plaintiff's entitlement to the $20,000 legacy under the will was plain; the estate appeared to have sufficient assets to pay it; the defendant executor had paid only $2,000, had been served and had actual notice of the relief sought, but did not appear or justify withholding the balance. The Court therefore ordered payment of the balance with interest and costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Probate List; Wills and Estates Legacy Claim / Notice of Motion for Payment of Balance of Legacy and Interest, Heard in the Defendant's Absence
Outcome
Defendant ordered to pay the balance of the plaintiff's legacy with interest and to pay the plaintiff's costs on the indemnity basis.
Legal Topics
['legacy Under Will' "executor's Administration of Estate" 'payment of Legacy' 'indemnity Costs']
['wills and Estates' 'probate' 'equity'] ['legacy Under Will' "executor's Administration of Estate" 'payment of Legacy' 'indemnity Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Division Probate List; Wills and Estates Legacy Claim / Notice of Motion for Payment of Balance of Legacy and Interest, Heard in the Defendant's Absence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the plaintiff was entitled to be paid the unpaid balance of the $20,000 legacy left to her under the deceased's will." 'Whether there was any reason, including insufficiency of the estate, why the defendant executor should not pay the legacy in full.' 'Whether costs should be ordered against the defendant on the indemnity basis.']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's entitlement to the $20,000 legacy under the will was plain; the estate appeared to have sufficient assets to pay it; the defendant executor had paid only $2,000, had been served and had actual notice of the relief sought, but did not appear or justify withholding the balance. The Court therefore ordered payment of the balance with interest and costs.

Court Disposition

Defendant ordered to pay the balance of the plaintiff's legacy with interest and to pay the plaintiff's costs on the indemnity basis.

Orders

  • ['Order in accordance with paragraph 4 of the notice of motion filed on 14 June 2013.' "The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings." 'The costs are to be assessed on the indemnity basis.']