Chopra, Dilip v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1997] FCA 1533
The documents read together establish that the Principal Member, Shun Chetty, directed pursuant to s 422(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) that Mr Duignan was to constitute the Tribunal for the purpose of concluding Mr Chopra's review. No case has been made out that Mr Duignan was not validly appointed.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Dilip Chopra; Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Motion for Adjournment
- Outcome
- Application for adjournment refused
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Tribunal Members, Procedural Fairness, Migration Act S 422
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dilip Chopra
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Motion for Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal was properly constituted under s 422 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
- 2 Whether there was a valid appointment of Mr Duignan as Tribunal member
Ratio Decidendi
The documents read together establish that the Principal Member, Shun Chetty, directed pursuant to s 422(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) that Mr Duignan was to constitute the Tribunal for the purpose of concluding Mr Chopra's review. No case has been made out that Mr Duignan was not validly appointed.
Court Disposition
Application for adjournment refused
Orders
- The application for adjournment is refused.
- The substantive case will proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment