Stepanyan v R [2014] NSWCCA 7
No error was made by the sentencing judge in treating the violence and use of a firearm as aggravating factors, given the intimidation and harm to both the compliant bar manager and the complicit security guard. The disparity in sentence between the applicant and the co-offender was justified by the applicant's more significant role, the addition of a Form 1 offence, and the respective discounts for pleas of guilty. The principle of parity was not breached, and the applicant did not establish a justifiable sense of grievance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal allowed; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal Against Sentence' 'robbery Whilst Armed With Dangerous Weapon' 'aggravation by Security Guard Being Shot' 'parity of Sentencing' 'form 1 Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence was improperly aggravated by the security guard, a co-offender, being shot' 'Whether the applicant had a justifiable sense of grievance given the degree of disparity in sentence compared to a co-offender']
Ratio Decidendi
No error was made by the sentencing judge in treating the violence and use of a firearm as aggravating factors, given the intimidation and harm to both the compliant bar manager and the complicit security guard. The disparity in sentence between the applicant and the co-offender was justified by the applicant's more significant role, the addition of a Form 1 offence, and the respective discounts for pleas of guilty. The principle of parity was not breached, and the applicant did not establish a justifiable sense of grievance.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal allowed; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal allowed' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment