Likiardopoulos v The Queen [2012] HCA 37

Likiardopoulos v The Queen [2012] HCA 37

There was no legal obstacle in convicting the appellant for murder as an accessory, even though the Crown had accepted pleas to lesser offences from other participants. The statutory regime (s 323 Crimes Act 1958 (Vic)) and common law development allow conviction as principal or accessory based on the trial evidence, regardless of the outcome for other alleged principals. There was no inconsistency or abuse of process in the prosecution’s conduct, and the appeal was dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Dimitrios Likiardopoulos; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / High Court Appeal From Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Victoria
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Accessorial Liability, Joint Criminal Enterprise, Aiding and Abetting, Counselling or Procuring, Abuse of Process, Prosecutorial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dimitrios Likiardopoulos

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / High Court Appeal From Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Victoria

  1. 1 Whether the appellant could be convicted as accessory to murder when the Crown had accepted pleas from other participants to lesser charges
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge should have left the accessorial case to the jury
  3. 3 Whether evidentiary inconsistency arose from differing charges and pleas

Ratio Decidendi

There was no legal obstacle in convicting the appellant for murder as an accessory, even though the Crown had accepted pleas to lesser offences from other participants. The statutory regime (s 323 Crimes Act 1958 (Vic)) and common law development allow conviction as principal or accessory based on the trial evidence, regardless of the outcome for other alleged principals. There was no inconsistency or abuse of process in the prosecution’s conduct, and the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.