McKellar on behalf of the Budjiti People v State of Queensland [2015] FCA 601

McKellar on behalf of the Budjiti People v State of Queensland [2015] FCA 601

The Court is satisfied, on the basis of extensive evidence and the parties’ informed consent, that the Budjiti People possess native title rights and interests in the determination area under traditional laws and customs, and those rights are appropriately recognised under Australian law pursuant to s 87 of the...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Dinny McKellar; Applicant: Melissa Bryan; Applicant: Phillip Eulo; Applicant: Margaret Hearn; Applicant: Carolyn Hooper; Applicant: Elizabeth McNiven; Respondent: State of Queensland; Respondent: Bulloo Shire Council; Respondent: Paroo Shire Council; Respondent: Ergon Energy Corporation Limited; Respondent: Telstra Corporation Limited; Respondent: Bridgefield Pty Limited; Respondent: Delhi Petroleum Pty Ltd; Respondent: Moonie Pipeline Company Pty Ltd; Respondent: Origin Energy CSG Limited; Respondent: Santos Limited; Respondent: Vamgas Pty Ltd; Respondent: Geoff Barton; Respondent: Bundoona Nominees Pty Ltd; Respondent: Fay Mary Cooney; Respondent: Grant Patrick Cooney; Respondent: Eileen Jean Easton; Respondent: Gordon Charles Easton; Respondent: Randall Kenneth Newsham; Respondent: Gregory Noel Vicary Sherwin
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Native Title Determination Application / Final Determination by Consent Under S 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
Outcome
Determination that native title exists in the area described and is held non-exclusively by the Budjiti People; orders by consent under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
Legal Topics
Consent Determination, Recognition of Native Title, Native Title Act 1993 (cth) S 87, Non Exclusive Native Title Rights, Prescribed Body Corporate, Statutory Requirements for Determination, Traditional Laws and Customs
Native Title Consent Determination Recognition of Native Title Native Title Act 1993 (cth) S 87 Non Exclusive Native Title Rights Prescribed Body Corporate Statutory Requirements for Determination Traditional Laws and Customs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dinny McKellar

Applicant

Melissa Bryan

Applicant

Phillip Eulo

Applicant

Margaret Hearn

Applicant

Carolyn Hooper

Applicant

Elizabeth McNiven

Applicant

State of Queensland

Respondent

Bulloo Shire Council

Respondent

Paroo Shire Council

Respondent

Ergon Energy Corporation Limited

Respondent

Telstra Corporation Limited

Respondent

Bridgefield Pty Limited

Respondent

Delhi Petroleum Pty Ltd

Respondent

Moonie Pipeline Company Pty Ltd

Respondent

Origin Energy CSG Limited

Respondent

Santos Limited

Respondent

Vamgas Pty Ltd

Respondent

Geoff Barton

Respondent

Bundoona Nominees Pty Ltd

Respondent

Fay Mary Cooney

Respondent

Grant Patrick Cooney

Respondent

Eileen Jean Easton

Respondent

Gordon Charles Easton

Respondent

Randall Kenneth Newsham

Respondent

Gregory Noel Vicary Sherwin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Native Title Determination Application / Final Determination by Consent Under S 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)

  1. 1 Is it appropriate to make a consent determination of native title under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)?
  2. 2 Do the Budjiti People satisfy the requirements for recognition of native title in the claim area?
  3. 3 What are the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests?

Ratio Decidendi

The Court is satisfied, on the basis of extensive evidence and the parties’ informed consent, that the Budjiti People possess native title rights and interests in the determination area under traditional laws and customs, and those rights are appropriately recognised under Australian law pursuant to s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

Court Disposition

Determination that native title exists in the area described and is held non-exclusively by the Budjiti People; orders by consent under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

Orders

  • Native title exists in the Determination Area.
  • Native title held by the Budjiti People, via Budjiti Aboriginal Corporation as prescribed body corporate.