Diona Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2024] NSWIRComm 1068
The inspector did not make adequate or reasonable inquiries, particularly as to Cahill's role and systems, and thus lacked an objective factual foundation on which to reasonably believe Diona was contravening section 19 of the WHS Act or clause 300 of the WHS Regulation. The internal review and original improvement notice should be revoked due to the absence of sufficient facts and failures in the inquiry process.
- Parties
- Applicant: Diona Pty Ltd; Respondent: SafeWork NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- External Review / Final Determination
- Outcome
- external review upheld, improvement notice revoked
- Legal Topics
- Improvement Notice, External Review, Reasonable Belief, Principal Contractor Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Diona Pty Ltd
Applicant
SafeWork NSW
Respondent
Procedural Posture
External Review / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there were facts which could found a reasonable belief that a contravention has occurred
- 2 Whether the inspector made reasonable inquiries before issuing the improvement notice
- 3 Whether the obligations under section 19 WHS Act and clause 300 WHS Regulation were contravened by Diona as principal contractor
Ratio Decidendi
The inspector did not make adequate or reasonable inquiries, particularly as to Cahill's role and systems, and thus lacked an objective factual foundation on which to reasonably believe Diona was contravening section 19 of the WHS Act or clause 300 of the WHS Regulation. The internal review and original improvement notice should be revoked due to the absence of sufficient facts and failures in the inquiry process.
Court Disposition
external review upheld, improvement notice revoked
Orders
- The external review is upheld.
- The internal review decision made by the SafeWork reviewer on 19 October 2022 is revoked.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment