Regina v Blissett [2006] NSWSC 1383
There is insufficient material to show the Crown case is sufficiently strong, nor is there any evidence of risk of flight, danger to the community, or risk of interfering with witnesses. Therefore, no stay is warranted and bail should be granted on the same conditions as set by the Magistrate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Review / Application for Review of Bail Granted by Magistrate
- Outcome
- Bail granted
- Legal Topics
- ['bail' 'stay of Grant of Bail' 'review of Grant of Bail']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bail Review / Application for Review of Bail Granted by Magistrate
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether bail should be granted on review' 'Whether stay of bail granted by Magistrate was warranted']
Ratio Decidendi
There is insufficient material to show the Crown case is sufficiently strong, nor is there any evidence of risk of flight, danger to the community, or risk of interfering with witnesses. Therefore, no stay is warranted and bail should be granted on the same conditions as set by the Magistrate.
Court Disposition
Bail granted
Orders
- ['Bail is granted on the same conditions as those set by the Magistrate: (1) Reside at 8 Gillespie Street, Liverpool and nowhere else; (2) Report to Green Valley police station every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday between 6 am and 6 pm; (3) Enter into agreement without security to forfeit $5,000 if bail undertaking...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment