DIR16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1935

DIR16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1935

Neither of the proposed grounds of appeal had any real prospect of success: the Authority adequately considered the applicant's profile and country information, and the arguments regarding failure to consider specific claims or misunderstanding of country information were without merit. Accordingly, the extension of time to appeal was refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 December 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time on Appeal / Federal Court Determination of Extension Application
Outcome
Application for extension of time refused. Proceeding dismissed. Costs ordered against applicant.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'asylum Seekers' 'refugee Law']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'asylum Seekers' 'refugee Law']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time on Appeal / Federal Court Determination of Extension Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an extension of time to appeal should be granted' 'Whether proposed grounds of appeal had any prospects of success']

Ratio Decidendi

Neither of the proposed grounds of appeal had any real prospect of success: the Authority adequately considered the applicant's profile and country information, and the arguments regarding failure to consider specific claims or misunderstanding of country information were without merit. Accordingly, the extension of time to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time refused. Proceeding dismissed. Costs ordered against applicant.

Orders

  • ['The Application for an Extension of Time is refused.' 'The proceeding is dismissed.' 'The Applicant is to pay the costs of the First Respondent, either as agreed or assessed.']