Directed Electronics OE Pty Ltd v OE Solutions Pty Ltd (No 9) [2023] FCA 462
The quantification of secret commission liability should only be against the entities that made the relevant payments, not global cross-liability, and both Mr Meneses (fiduciary) and Hanhwa parties (knowing assisters) are liable for compound interest on those amounts with yearly rests as a compensatory remedy, reflecting their participation and knowledge in the breaches.
- Parties
- Applicant: Directed Electronics OE Pty Ltd; First Respondent: OE Solutions Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: HANHWA AUS PTY LTD; Third Respondent: HAN HWA HIGHTECH AUSTRALIA PTY LTD; Fourth Respondent: LEEMAN AUS PTY LTD; Fifth Respondent: HANHWA HIGHTECH CO., LTD; Sixth Respondent: JOHNNY MENESES; Seventh Respondent: CRAIG MILLS; Eighth Respondent: KICHANG (RYAN) LEE; Ninth Respondent: NATHAN MENESES; Tenth Respondent: GRIDTRAQ AUSTRALIA PTY LTD; Eleventh Respondent: WEBHOUSE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PTY LTD; Twelfth Respondent: LEEMAN CO. LTD; Thirteenth Respondent: QUANTAM TELEMATICS PTY LTD
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Law, Claim for Secret Commissions and Interest / Post Liability, Determination of Quantum and Interest; Judgment on Quantification and Interest Following Earlier Liability Decision
- Outcome
- Applicant substantially successful in principles; judgment on quantum and interest directions only, with parties to bring in draft orders consistent with reasons.
- Legal Topics
- Secret Commissions, Compound Interest, Fiduciary Duties, Knowing Assistance, Corporate Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Directed Electronics OE Pty Ltd
Applicant
OE Solutions Pty Ltd
First Respondent
HANHWA AUS PTY LTD
Second Respondent
HAN HWA HIGHTECH AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Third Respondent
LEEMAN AUS PTY LTD
Fourth Respondent
HANHWA HIGHTECH CO., LTD
Fifth Respondent
JOHNNY MENESES
Sixth Respondent
CRAIG MILLS
Seventh Respondent
KICHANG (RYAN) LEE
Eighth Respondent
NATHAN MENESES
Ninth Respondent
GRIDTRAQ AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Tenth Respondent
WEBHOUSE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PTY LTD
Eleventh Respondent
LEEMAN CO. LTD
Twelfth Respondent
QUANTAM TELEMATICS PTY LTD
Thirteenth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Corporations Law, Claim for Secret Commissions and Interest / Post Liability, Determination of Quantum and Interest; Judgment on Quantification and Interest Following Earlier Liability Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate quantification of secret commission payments owed by the relevant respondents?
- 2 Which Hanhwa parties are liable and to what extent for the secret commissions?
- 3 Should simple or compound interest apply to the amounts found to be owed, and with what periodic rests?
Ratio Decidendi
The quantification of secret commission liability should only be against the entities that made the relevant payments, not global cross-liability, and both Mr Meneses (fiduciary) and Hanhwa parties (knowing assisters) are liable for compound interest on those amounts with yearly rests as a compensatory remedy, reflecting their participation and knowledge in the breaches.
Court Disposition
Applicant substantially successful in principles; judgment on quantum and interest directions only, with parties to bring in draft orders consistent with reasons.
Orders
- Parties to file and serve minutes of proposed orders consistent with reasons by 1pm on 19 May 2023
- Compound interest to be paid by relevant parties at RBA cash rate plus 4% with yearly rests; quantum to reflect actual payments made by each entity as set out in reasons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment