R v RAG [2006] NSWCCA 343
The trial judge erred by considering irrelevant and extraneous matters, failed to properly apply the statutory test, and ignored evidence capable of establishing the complainant's competency under s 13 Evidence Act 1995; therefore, the decision that the complainant was not competent to give unsworn evidence must be set aside, and the Crown's appeal allowed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Crown Appeal / Appeal From Interlocutory Judgment (competency Ruling) in District Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decision of Maguire DCJ is set aside.
- Legal Topics
- ['witness Competency' 'child Witnesses' 'procedure for Unsworn Evidence' 'interlocutory Appeals']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal / Appeal From Interlocutory Judgment (competency Ruling) in District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in finding that the child complainant was not competent to give unsworn evidence under s 13(2) Evidence Act 1995' 'Whether the decision was an interlocutory judgment or order within s 5F(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred by considering irrelevant and extraneous matters, failed to properly apply the statutory test, and ignored evidence capable of establishing the complainant's competency under s 13 Evidence Act 1995; therefore, the decision that the complainant was not competent to give unsworn evidence must be set aside, and the Crown's appeal allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decision of Maguire DCJ is set aside.
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed.' 'Decision of Maguire QC DCJ of 17 February 2006 is set aside.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment