Director of War Service Homes v Law [1955] HCA 22
The purchaser's interest under a War Service Homes Act contract is excluded from property vesting in the Official Receiver on sequestration, and cannot be validly assigned by a deed of arrangement without the Director's written consent.
- Parties
- Appellant: Director of War Service Homes; Debtor: James Bramwell Bird; Respondent Trustee: Charles Allen Law
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 1955
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Federal Court of Bankruptcy
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Property, Deeds of Arrangement, War Service Homes Act, Effect of Bankruptcy on Contract, Transfer of Interests in Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of War Service Homes
Appellant
James Bramwell Bird
Debtor
Charles Allen Law
Respondent Trustee
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Federal Court of Bankruptcy
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a deed of arrangement under Part XII of the Bankruptcy Act effect an assignment of a purchaser's interest under a War Service Homes Act contract?
- 2 Are interests under such contracts protected from divestment by operation of bankruptcy laws or assignment without the Director's consent under the War Service Homes Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The purchaser's interest under a War Service Homes Act contract is excluded from property vesting in the Official Receiver on sequestration, and cannot be validly assigned by a deed of arrangement without the Director's written consent.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the Court of Bankruptcy discharged.
- Motion of the respondent trustee dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment