State of New South Wales v Julianne Higgins by her tutor David Benedict O'Shea; Barnardos Australia v Julianne Higgins [2005] NSWCA 244
The plaintiff was substantially impeded for continuous periods during the relevant limitation period due to mental illness, and s 52(1)(e) entitled her to an extension of three years from the last period of disability; the appeals were dismissed as the action was commenced within time.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Leave to Appeal and Appeals From Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['disability Due to Mental Illness' 'extension of Limitation Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Leave to Appeal and Appeals From Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff was under a disability due to mental illness during the limitation period' 'Whether the limitation period was extended under the Limitation Act 1969 by reason of disability']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was substantially impeded for continuous periods during the relevant limitation period due to mental illness, and s 52(1)(e) entitled her to an extension of three years from the last period of disability; the appeals were dismissed as the action was commenced within time.
Court Disposition
appeals dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Notices of appeal to be filed and served within 10 days.' 'Appeals dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment