Re Rose, Robert Michael [1983] FCA 197

Re Rose, Robert Michael [1983] FCA 197

Given that the deficiency was explained by market circumstances beyond the bankrupt's control, no misconduct or recklessness was established, and the major creditors did not participate in the proceedings, the court found no useful purpose would be served by continuation of the bankruptcy. A term of seven and a half years bankrupt was sufficient.

Parties
Applicant/bankrupt: Robert Michael Rose; Official Receiver/trustee: Official Receiver; Trustee/objector: Trustee
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 August 1983
Procedural Posture
Application for Discharge From Bankruptcy / Judgment on Application
Outcome
Discharge from bankruptcy ordered.
Legal Topics
Discharge of Bankrupt, Exercise of Judicial Discretion, Interests of Bankrupt and Creditors

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 22
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Michael Rose

Applicant/bankrupt

Official Receiver

Official Receiver/trustee

Trustee

Trustee/objector

Procedural Posture

Application for Discharge From Bankruptcy / Judgment on Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be discharged from bankruptcy under section 150 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966

Ratio Decidendi

Given that the deficiency was explained by market circumstances beyond the bankrupt's control, no misconduct or recklessness was established, and the major creditors did not participate in the proceedings, the court found no useful purpose would be served by continuation of the bankruptcy. A term of seven and a half years bankrupt was sufficient.

Court Disposition

Discharge from bankruptcy ordered.

Orders

  • The public examination of the bankrupt shall be deemed to have been concluded on 20 July, 1976.
  • Discharge of the bankrupt.