Christopher Murray & Anor v RentWorks Limited & Ors [2001] NSWIRComm 252

Christopher Murray & Anor v RentWorks Limited & Ors [2001] NSWIRComm 252

Further discovery should be ordered on a limited basis in accordance with the specific categories set out in the judgment, balancing the need for relevant evidence against potential oppression and undue burden. Overly broad or inappropriately drafted descriptions are unacceptable bases for discovery orders. The timetable for affidavits in reply is accordingly modified.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application Under Section 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Discovery Dispute; Orders for Further and Limited Discovery; Interlocutory Decision
Outcome
Interlocutory orders for further limited discovery granted in part; timetable for affidavits amended; costs reserved; liberty to apply granted.
Legal Topics
['discovery' 'oppression' 'practice and Procedure' 'shareholder Valuation' 'business Arrangements']
['industrial Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['discovery' 'oppression' 'practice and Procedure' 'shareholder Valuation' 'business Arrangements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application Under Section 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Discovery Dispute; Orders for Further and Limited Discovery; Interlocutory Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether further discovery should be ordered under Rule 162 of Industrial Relations Commission Rules' 'Determination of the appropriate scope and limitation of discovery categories' 'Whether specific date ranges or types of documents should limit discovery, considering potential oppression and relevance to valuation issues']

Ratio Decidendi

Further discovery should be ordered on a limited basis in accordance with the specific categories set out in the judgment, balancing the need for relevant evidence against potential oppression and undue burden. Overly broad or inappropriately drafted descriptions are unacceptable bases for discovery orders. The timetable for affidavits in reply is accordingly modified.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders for further limited discovery granted in part; timetable for affidavits amended; costs reserved; liberty to apply granted.

Orders

  • ['Applicants to file minutes of orders within 7 days.' 'Discovery in the specified three categories to be given within 42 days of judgment.' 'Applicants permitted to file any further affidavit in reply within 14 days of discovery being given.' 'Costs reserved.' 'Liberty to apply.']