Flashback Holdings Pty Limited v Showtime DVD Holdings Pty Ltd (No 4) [2009] FCA 461

Flashback Holdings Pty Limited v Showtime DVD Holdings Pty Ltd (No 4) [2009] FCA 461

The first and third respondents substantially failed to comply with the discovery order by not disclosing documents relied upon in their evidence, activating the self-executing order which struck out their defences and resulted in judgment against them.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Judgment; Orders Following Application for Judgment Due to Breach of Discovery Order
Outcome
judgment entered against first and third respondents; defence struck out; leave to discontinue proceeding against second respondent; trial vacated; matter stood over for directions
Legal Topics
['discovery' 'self Executing Orders' 'striking Out of Defences' 'judgment for Failure to Comply']
['civil Procedure'] ['discovery' 'self Executing Orders' 'striking Out of Defences' 'judgment for Failure to Comply']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Judgment; Orders Following Application for Judgment Due to Breach of Discovery Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the first and third respondents failed to comply with the discovery order' 'Whether non-compliance with the discovery order activated the self-executing order to strike out defences and enter judgment']

Ratio Decidendi

The first and third respondents substantially failed to comply with the discovery order by not disclosing documents relied upon in their evidence, activating the self-executing order which struck out their defences and resulted in judgment against them.

Court Disposition

judgment entered against first and third respondents; defence struck out; leave to discontinue proceeding against second respondent; trial vacated; matter stood over for directions

Orders

  • ['Registrar to record on the Court file that the first and third respondents’ defences were struck out on 18 March 2009 and judgment entered against them in favour of the first applicant.' 'Leave granted to the first applicant to discontinue the proceeding against the second respondent.' 'Hearing of the trial listed...